Pelosi, Clinton & Obama Kiss Terrorist State Leader’s Ass
Now the NY Sun reveals that both Senators Clinton and Obama have sent emissaries to visit with Assad. Once again the Democratic Party is meddling in foreign policy. And guess who is representing Obama; None other than Zbigniew Brzezinski. From a piece by James Lewis from American Thinker:
If you're too young to remember the name Zbigniew Brzezinski, he is Jimmy Carter foreign policy genius, on whose watch the Iranian mullahs got into thirty years of power -- with a nuke coming right up. Brzezinski still thinks today that he and Jimmy were right to bring in old mass-murdering Ayatollah Khomeini in 1979. These people are never wrong. Would you trust this guy to represent the United States against Islamofascist terror types?
So what’s the purpose of the Pelosi, Clinton and Obama ass kissing with the head of a terrorist state? From Lewis:
Damascus has also been the transit point for thousands of jihadis going to Iraq to commit suicide-murders against Americans and Iraqis. If you want to talk to Al Qaida and the gang, Damascus is your place. Syria's President Assad is also Iran's best buddy in the Arab world. (Iran is the State Department's biggest terror-sponsoring state.) So Assad is the go-to guy for all the terror sponsors.
It's obvious that Hillabama desperately need to send a can't-wait message to the people who attacked us on 9/11. So urgent that they can't even wait for the Democrats to declare a presidential candidate, or to defeat John McCain. This must be a message Hillary and Obama are coordinating with each other, since they are sending both of their foreign policy advisors at the same time to the same place.
Question: What message would that be?
Here's a fair guess. They are telling Terror Central to hold any plans to attack us during the presidential election. Why? Because another 9/11 attack before the election would give the presidency to John McCain, who looks like a hard-ball guy militarily.
Obama and Clinton are attempting to manipulate world events to their personal advantage. Never mind that their meddling in U.S. foreign policy can have disastrous consequences for the U.S. But hey, if they were worried about damaging the U.S., they would not hold the political views that they hold.
Lewis does a fine job of delineating the intended selling out to weaken America by the Democratic Party’s leadership. Go here to read it.
Maybe we should rethink the application of the term “traitor” as it pertains to the leadership of the Democratic Party. How frustrating it must be for legislators, who really want the U.S. to remain strong, to deal with these people day in and day out.
Links in this Blog:
Pelosi brings message of peace to Assad
'Realism' in Syria
Is an October Surrender in the Making?